Ekstremisme og antiradikalisering

Preben Bertelsen: Radikalisering, ekstremisme og antiradikalisering i Tilværelsespsykologiens perspektiv (oprindelig også kendt som Aarhusmodellen)

Grundtanken i den tilværelsespsykologiske tilgang til ekstremisme er følgende: Normalt opleves verden af de fleste som et rimeligt trygt og godt sted at være. Med et kernebegreb fra Tilværelsespsykologien kan man sige, at manoplever, at man har en tryg tilværelsestilknytning. Men sådan er det ikke for alle. Nogle vil opleve en utryg eller forstyrret tilværelsestilknytning.

Mennesker der oplever en utryg/forstyrret tilværelsestilknytning vil som regel prøve at gøre noget ved det - ved hjælp af deres almenmenneskelige tilværelseskompetencer - og forsøge at genoprette tilværelsestilknytningen som god og tryg. Nogle mennesker vil også gå mere omfattende til værks og forsøge kulturelt/religiøst eller politisk at ændre på verden/samfundet, så det i deres optik kan blive et godt sted og være. 

Denne bestræbelse på at få greb om tilværelsen og (gen-)oprette grundlaget og muligheder for en tryg tilværelsestilknytning vil den enkelte som regel opleve som personligt meningsfyldt. Men denne bestræbelse har ud over den personlige mening også en betydning for fællesskabet.  Den betydning éns greb om tilværelsen og bestræbelse på forandring kan være konstruktiv eller destruktiv (herunder voldelig ekstremisme, terrorismen)

Hvilken retning, éns greb om tilværelsen og éns tilværelsesbane tager, afhænger af de almenmenneskelige tilværelseskompetencer - deres udviklingsniveau og den måde de bliver brugt på. En vellykket indsats mod voldelig radikalisering bygger i det tilværelsespsykologiske perspektiv på to ting: (a) En forståelse for at den radikaliserede persons tilværelsestilknytning (reelt og/eller oplevet) er usikker/forstyrret - (b) empowerment, feks gennem mentorindsatser, af personens tilværelseskompetencer, så de styrkes og bruges på en måde, der ikke bare giver mening, men også har konstruktiv betydning for det almenmenneskelige fællesskab.

.

.

Videnskabelige artikler og bogkapitler om ekstremisme og antiradikalisering


Bertelsen, P. (2018): Mentoring in Anti-radicalisation. LGT: A Systematic Assessment, Intervention and Supervision Tool in Mentoring.

Læs mere

Bertelsen, P. (2018): Mentoring in Anti-radicalisation. LGT: A Systematic Assessment, Intervention and Supervision Tool in Mentoring. In: Overland, G, Andersen, A., Førde, K. E., Grødum, K. and J. Salomonsen (eds.): Violent Extremism in the 21st Century. International Perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle

I dette bogkapitel fremlægges en model for mentorindsats i tilværelsespsykologiens perspektiv

Bertelsen, P. (2018) ‘The Fight against Violent Extremism: The Aarhus Model’

Læse mere

Preben Bertelsen (2018) ‘The Fight against Violent Extremism: The Aarhus Model’, in: Jana Kärgel (ed.) ‘They Have No Plan B.’ Radicalization, Departure, Return – Between Prevention and Intervention. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bonn

En kort introduktion til Aarhusmodellen - mentoring og antiradikalisering i tilværelsespsykologiens perspektiv

Kruglanski, A. & Bertelsen, P. (2020): Life Psychology and Significance Quest. A Complementary Approach to Violent Extremism and Counter Radicalization.

Læs mere

Kruglanski, A. & Bertelsen, P. (2020): Life Psychology and Significance Quest. A Complementary Approach to Violent Extremism and Counter Radicalization. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism. DOI: 10.1080/18335330.2020.1725098

Abstract: We compare two recent psychological theories of violent extremism that share substantial commonalities: (1) The Life Psychology model (Bertelsen, 2015) that underwrites the mentoring tool in the Aarhus/Danish model of countering violent extremism, and (2) Significance Quest Theory that highlights the conjunction of Needs, Narratives and Networks in prompting this phenomenon (e.g. Kruglanski et al., 2013, 2014, 2017; Kruglanski, Belanger & Gunaratna, 2019). Integration of the two theories clarifies further the conditions for violent extremism and implies practical guidelines for reducing it

 


Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2018): Capturing violent radicalization: Developing and validating scales measuring central aspects of radicalization

Læs mere

Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2018): Capturing violent radicalization: Developing and validating scales measuring central aspects of radicalization. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12484

Abstract: Violent radicalization has emerged as an important topic of theoretical and empirical investigation motivated by the devastating face of terrorism and by the aim of preventing such expressions of extremism. One central aspect of such research inquiries is the foundation of solid measurement. In this article, we develop and validate two generic scales pertaining to (1) endorsement of extremism and (2) acceptance of violent and/or illegal means. In conclusion,

the scales yielded sound psychometric properties and cross-cultural equivalence, providing a solid measure of the important aspects of extremism which can be empirically employed in elucidating generic mechanisms of violent radicalization processes.

Ozer, S. & Bertelsen, P. (2019): Countering Radicalization: An Empirical Examination from a Life Psychological Perspective.

Læs mere

Ozer, S. & Bertelsen, P. (2019): Countering Radicalization: An Empirical Examination from a Life Psychological Perspective. Peace and Conflict.  DOI: 10.1037/pac0000394

Abstract: Life Psychology has emerged as an integrative framework theory that recently has been applied in interventions preventing and countering radicalization processes. The theory mphasize the interplay between generic life tasks and skills through which the individual is able to reach a god enough life embedded within a secure attachment to the sociocultural context. Through cross-national samples from the US and Denmark, the present paper operationalize and validate the central concepts of life skills and life-attachment. Furthermore, these measures are applied in a statistical model finding insecure life-attachment to be a root factor in relation to extremism and life skills to be moderating this relationship. Consequently, the study draws attention to how interventions can develop generic life skills as a way of preventing and countering radicalization processes. The findings are discussed in relation to relevant psychological research on radicalization and in relation to its implications.

Ozer, S. og Bertelsen, P. (2020): The Moral Compass and Life Skills in Navigating Radicalization Processes: Examining the Interplay among Life Skills, Moral Disengagement, and Extremism.

Læs mere

Ozer, S. og Bertelsen, P. (2020): The Moral Compass and Life Skills in Navigating Radicalization Processes: Examining the Interplay among Life Skills, Moral Disengagement, and Extremism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/SJOP.12636

Abstract: Basic human life skills are needed and employed in everyday participation in own and common life. Consequently, deficiently developed life skills can impede successful agency and participation within both the local community and in larger society; furthermore, deficiently developed life skills may obstruct an individual from achieving a good enough life. To reestablish one’s successful life embeddedness, the individual might engage in extremism to make profound changes to general life conditions, culture and society without concern for others. Such harmful attempts to reach a good enough life may rely on immoral behavior, suggesting that mechanisms of moral disengagement are central within a generic model of radicalization. The present study investigated the interplay among deficient life skills, moral disengagement, and extremist attitude across two national contexts. Using a sample of young students in high school or college (N = 686) the present study found significant indirect effects between deficient life skills (agency and structure) and various aspects of an extremist mindset through moral disengagement These findings suggest that these two psychological concepts of life skills and moral disengagement are relevant for understanding and countering violent radicalization processes; that is to say that morality can direct the life skills toward either violent extremism or nonviolent, legal civil participation. Furthermore, the development and empowerment of life skills could enhance individual resilience to morally disengaging narratives and radicalized ideologies